Розглянуто питання, пов’язані із з’ясуванням деяких аспектів правового статусу
цивільного відповідача як учасника (суб’єкта) кримінального провадження. Участь осіб
у кримінальному провадженні потребує чіткого знання прав та обов’язків кожного
учасника цих відносин, зокрема і цивільного відповідача. Визначено, що цивільний
відповідач є самостійним учасником кримінального процесу, який відповідно до свого
The question of concept and maintenance of realization of judicial examination is considered in the field of intellectual property during pre-trial investigation. The order of realization of judicial examination is described in the field of intellectual property. The basic types of over judicial examinations are brought in the field of intellectual property. The task of judicial expert is outlined at investigational objects of intellectual property.
Strengthening the role of prosecutors by the exercise of supervision in the form of pre-trial investigation procedure requires management to study the characteristics exercising their judicial powers on key areas of criminal procedural activities.
The main means of formation is evidence investigations. Accordingly, both theoretical and practical point of view of the relevant question is under what conditions they can be considered legitimate and how they can ensure legitimacy.
In the article the question of the definition in the scientific interpretation of the concept of judicial discretion. On the basis of the analysis seems possible to display a single definition of judicial discretion investigating judge in criminal proceedings, given the peculiarity of his judicial authority in criminal proceedings for the control of the rights and freedoms of participants in criminal proceedings. It is explained the choice of terms, basic expressions included in the explanation of judicial discretion investigating judge.